Forensic Pathology

Forensic Pathology Forensic pathology has given us the ability to discover almost anything about someone using the smallest clues. A hair, tooth, or even tissue from a bullet hole can uncover the answers to a crime scene. It has become so advanced that the accuracy is 1 in 37 trillion. The new testing that's coming out is supposed to be even more accurate. One pathologist says that it could be compared to a computer; with the new developments you're paying the same price (about $2,000 per DNA scan) and getting a lot better data.It can also be used to prevent deaths and detect harmful drugs in someone. Beacause of the advancements in forensic pathology it has become one of the most helpful contributions to humankind.Fingerprinting is the easiest, most popular form of identity, but dental X-rays and CAT scans can help a tremendous amount. Charles Wetli, a forensic pathologist was able to identify every victim in an airplane explosion using these techniques.Micah's DNAHe can tell if it was a set up suicid e or really a homicide by studying injuries that could have resulted from gunshots, poisoning, or a forceful blow. All this info is very expensive to generate though.Without polymerase chain reaction procedures, capillary gel electrophoresis, or the ABI sequence analyzer DNA tests couldn't even take place. All these tests is how information is found. It used to take 2 to 4 weeks, but now it only takes 2 to 3 days. It all begins when police give specimens to the laboratory where pathologists discover evidence as they run the tests. The technologists search DNA for genetic markers by amplification and run the amplification on a sequence analyzer. If they find DNA, they try to find the genotype, and then of course they double-check their results. The results are...

Fungi essays

Fungi essays What are the fungi? Mushrooms, molds, yeasts, athlete's foot diseases, rusts, and smuts All are filamentous or unicellular. Individual filaments are termed hyphae. A mass of hyphae is the mycelium (the feeding stage) Walls of the filaments are of cellulose with chitin Cells are eucaryotic; that is, they contain nuclei, mitochondria, other organelles Nutritionally, all fungi are heterotrophic, mostly aerobic Saprophyticlive off dead organic matter Parasiticobtain nutrients by penetrating tiny branches (haustoria) into a host Sexualgametangia produce sperms and eggs Decomposers of organic materialsimportant recyclers of matter The representative genus I shall use is Saprolegnia (can be collected from freshwater habitats by using apple baits in wire cage) A true mycelium, of tubular threads The hyphae have 2N nuclei (numerous) Mycelium grows and sooner or later reproduces Zoospores are released, attach to a food particle, germinate to become hyphae, then mycelium The same mycelium that produced the sporangia now forms the sex organs Antheridia> sperms (gametes) Gamete fusion occurs in the oogonium Zygotes are released, germinate, attach to a food mass. Mycelium feeds, grows, eventually reproduces See page 532 in your text for the life cycle. ...

Is Grace True Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Is Grace True - Essay Example He made us to follow his path which some of us do and some of us don’t. We read through the Holy Books that God has made heaven and hell for those who do righteous deeds and those who do not, respectively. And this makes sense, of course. If we believe that God will save every person, then we will stop doing righteous deeds in the expectation that He will save us and will embrace us with all His love no matter what we do, as Philip and Mulholland state in their book. According to them, God is waiting for us up there with open arms and will hug us and save us from anything bad happening to us because he is an epitome of love rather than an epitome of cruelty. Okay, that is fine that He is not an epitome of cruelty, but does it makes sense that anybody who has been doing wrong deeds throughout his life, has been cruel with people, has been eating others’ money, has been lying and cheating, has been making others of His creation cry with sorrows, will be spared by God and embraced by Him with all His love and kindness? No, my Lord, No. This does not make sense at all. Another thing that I disagree with is that the authors say that there is no heaven, because if there is heaven, then there is possibility of a hell too. â€Å"The triumph of grace†¦cannot be complete until every last person has been redeemed† (196), the authors say. This is also an illogical piece of an argument. They say that since God loves us all, he has not created anything like hell in which he will put the wrongdoers. But the point to ponder is that if there is no hell, then is there a possibility of a heaven? Authors agree but do not prove it. My point is that-what about those who are bad people? What is there destiny? If there is no hell and God will save us all, then a good person and a bad one will stand shoulder by shoulder enjoying the same bounties and blessings of God. Why? Does not a man do a good deed in expectation of God’s mercy and blessings? A wron gdoer will keep on doing evil if he believes what authors say. He will keep on following the evil path if he believes that God will embrace and save him. Douglas Geivett, in his critique of the book contradicts the authors when they say that â€Å"salvation is not the hope of a few; it is the destiny of all† (160). Douglas states that if it were true, then salvation will also be for those who do not wish for it or deserve it. I agree with Douglas in that salvation is only for those who desire it and make efforts toward achieving it. Salvation is not such a petty little thing that God has made for all. This is the word â€Å"all† that I basically contradict with. The authors must have used the words â€Å"most of us† than â€Å"all†. Of course, God loves us and is determined to save us all but only if we are also determined to be saved by Him. He has told us what His path is through His Holy Books and Prophets. Now, it is our task to follow His path and ma ke ourselves better people so as to be held liable for His blessings and love. God loves us but we should also see the sufferings of a person who has done wrong deeds throughout his life but at the same time is struck with gloom and despair. God takes His revenge from those who do not follow him, and this is wrong to believe that He will save us all from the cruel fire of hell. The bottom-line is that the authors are not being rational in their arguments which are only based on their